Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Determinants for Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Positively Selected Local Chicks in Eastern and Central Uganda

Received: 13 September 2024     Accepted: 11 October 2024     Published: 18 November 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Despite rising demand, the supply of local chickens is declining, with their market share dropping from 87.7% to 69.9%, while exotic chicken populations have quadrupled from 4.6 million in 2008 to 17.8 million by 2021. To address this, the National Agricultural Research Organization is improving the production and productivity of Local chickens through positive selection of local chickens. This study investigates farmers’ willingness to pay for Positively selected Local Chicks (PLC) in Central and Eastern Uganda. A study involving 305 randomly selected poultry farming households from Central and Eastern Uganda. The study applies a probit model, to analyze the determinants that influence the probability that poultry farmers are willing to pay the market price bid (2700 UGX) for day-old positively selected local chicks. The dependent variable was the probability that poultry farmers are willing to pay the prevailing average market price whereby, they were categorized as 1= willingness to pay 2700 UGX and 0=Not willing to pay. An ordered probit model was used to analyze factors that influence the choice of price to be paid for a day-old positively selected Local chick. The dependent variable was the range of prices poultry farmers are willing to pay for day-old positively selected local chicken. Prices ranged from 1890, 2160, 2430, 2565, 2700, 2835, 2970, 3240, and 3510. They were categorized into; lower bid (less than 2700) market price bid (2700) and high bid (more than 2700 UGX). The study further analyzed the factors that influenced the maximum price that farmers are willing to pay for day-old positively selected local chicken, multiple linear regression was used. The study revealed that 89.84% of farmers were willing to pay the lowest price (1890 UGX) for day-old positively selected local chicks, while only 25.57% were willing to pay the market price of 2700 UGX. Factors influencing willingness to pay include the age of the farmer, household size, total land owned, education level, access to credit, membership in a farmer’s group, phone ownership, distance to the nearest market, and radio ownership. These findings suggest that targeted interventions are needed to enhance the adoption of positively selected local chicks.

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13
Page(s) 306-320
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Positively Selected Local Chick (PLC), Willingness to Pay (WTP), Chicks

References
[1] Abeykoon, M. N. D. F., Weerahewa, J., Weligamage, P., & Silva, G. L. L. P. (2014a). Willingness to Pay for Chicks of Different Indigenous Chicken Types: An Application of Experimental Auctions. Tropical Agricultural Research, 26(1), 162–174.
[2] Barbato, G. F. (1999). Genetic relationships between selection for growth and reproductive effectiveness. Poultry Science, 78(3), 444-452.
[3] Bett, H. K., Peters, K. J., Nwankwo, U. M., & Bokelmann, W. (2013). Estimating consumer preferences and willingness to pay for the underutilized Indigenous chicken products. Food Policy, 41, 218–225.
[4] Byarugaba, D. K. (2007) Poultry Sector Country Review. Emergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases Socio Economics, Production and Biodiversity Unit. FAO Animal Production and Health Division and Makerere University, Uganda.
[5] Dossani, R., & Ranganathan, V. (2004). Farmers' willingness to pay for power in India: conceptual issues, survey results and implications for pricing. Energy Economics, 26(3), 359-369.
[6] Kamau, C. N., Kabuage, L. W., & Bett, E. K. (2019). Analysis of improved indigenous chicken adoption among smallholder farmers: The case of Makueni and Kakamega Counties, Kenya. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 7(1), 21-37.
[7] Njuguna, C. K., Lucy W. Kabuage, and Eric K. Bett. "Economic analysis of indigenous chicken production: The case of smallholder farmers in Makueni and Kakamega Counties, Kenya." International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development 5, no. 5(2017): 564-570.
[8] FAO. (2009). Poultry Genetic Resources and Small Poultry Production Systems in Uganda: Promoting strategies for prevention and control of HPAI. Rome.
[9] FAO. (2013). POULTRY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW:
[10] Fisseha, Moges; Azage, Tegegne; Tadelle, D. (n. d.). Indigenous chicken production and marketing systems in Ethiopia: Characteristics and opportunities for market-oriented development Indigenous chicken production and marketing: working paper. 2010, (24).
[11] Gall-ely, M. Le. (2009). Definition, Measurement, and Determinants of the Consumer’s Willingness to Pay: a Critical Synthesis and Avenues for Further Research, 24(2).
[12] Gangnat, I. D. M., Mueller, S., Kreuzer, M., Messikommer, R. E., Siegrist, M., & Visschers, V. H. M. (2017). Swiss consumers ’ willingness to pay and attitudes regarding dual-purpose poultry and eggs. Poultry Science, 97(3), 1089–1098.
[13] Hailemichael, A., Gebremedhin, B., & Tegegne, A. (2017). NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Status and Drivers of Village Poultry Production and its efficiency in Ethiopia. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, (September), 0–1.
[14] Hsu, D., & Tan, Q. (2013). Understanding village poultry through the agricultural household model – A systematic literature review, (830).
[15] Jedidi, K., & Jagpal, S. (2009). Willingness to pay: measurement and managerial implications.
[16] Kamau, C. N., Kabuage, L. W., & Bett, E. K. (2018). Impact of improved indigenous chicken breeds on productivity. The case of smallholder farmers in Makueni and Kakamega counties, Kenya. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 4(1), 1477232.
[17] Klingemann, W., Kim, J., & Füller, K. D. (2019). Willingness to Pay: Handbook of Market Research. Springer, Cham.
[18] Kugonza, D. R. (2019). Local chicken production in Uganda: Breeding practices and flock productivity: conference paper. Researchgate, November). http://repository.ruforum.org/documents/local-chicken-production
[19] MAAIF. (2019). Poultry training manual for extension workers in Uganda, (August).
[20] Macharia, J., Ogolah, E., & Munyaneza, J. (2022). Indigenous Chicken Farming in Kenya: A Minireview of Genetic Resource, Production Systems, Constraints, and Opportunities. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genomics, 6(4)
[21] Mango, S. L., Bett, E. K., & Nyairo, N. (2019). Impact of credit uptake on the performance of improved Indigenous chicken enterprises among smallholder farmers in Kenya. International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development,7(2), 1–5.
[22] Mathiu, E. M., Ndirangu, S. N., & Mwangi, S. C. (2021). Production of indigenous poultry among smallholder farmers in Tigania West Meru County, Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 17(5), 705–713.
[23] Mujyambere, V., Adomako, K., Olympio, S. O., Ntawubizi, M., Nyinawamwiza, L., Mahoro, J., & Conroy, A. (2022). Local chickens in East African region: their production and potential. Poultry Science, 101(1).
[24] Mukarumbwa, P., Taruvinga, A., & Madikizela, A. (2021). An analysis of factors that determine the choice of indigenous chicken (IC) owned by rural households in Alice Communal Area, South Africa. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 3.
[25] Mustapha, A. S. A. and A. L., & Audu. (2020). Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Chicken Meat Traits: A Discrete Choice Experiment Approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Environment and Social Sciences, 6(1), 131–139.
[26] Natukunda K, K. D. R. and K. C. C. (2011). Indigenous chickens of the Kamuli Plains in Uganda: II. Factors affecting their marketing and profitability: Retrieved September 10, 2024, from
[27] Ndenga, C., & Kabuage, L. W. & Bett, E. K. (2018). Economic analysis of Consumer demand for indigenous chicken eggs in Kenya: RUFORUM Working Document Series. RUFORUM, 17(17), 283–291.
[28] Nduthu, P. W. (2013). The factors influencing indigenous poultry production in Kathiani district, Machakos County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
[29] Nduthu, P. W. (2015). Social- economics influence on indigenous poultry production project in Kenya. A case of Machakos indigenous poultry. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(1), 1–12.
[30] Padhi, M. K. (2016). Importance of Indigenous Breeds of Chicken for Rural Economy and Their Improvements for Higher Production Performance. Scientifica (Cairo), 2016.
[31] Sese, H. S. (2022). Farmers’ willingness to pay (wtp) for local chicken ecotypes with enhanced Newcastle disease resistance in Dodoma and Singida regions, Tanzania (Doctoral dissertation, Sokoine University of Agriculture)..
[32] Singh, M., Patton, R. N., Mollier, R. T., Pongener, N., Yadav, R., Singh, V., … Mishra, V. K. (2023). Indigenous chicken production system in different agroecology of Indian Himalayan Region: implication on food and economic security, (September), 1–13.
[33] Steigenberger, C., Flatscher, M., Uwe, T., & Leiter, A. M. (2022). Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies. The European Journal of Health Economics, 23(9), 1455–1482.
[34] Tainika, B., & Duman, M. (2019). Poultry Production in Uganda: Challenges and Opportunities Poultry Production in Uganda: Challenges and Opportunities. Researchgate, (October 2021).
[35] Thong, N. T., & Solgaard, H. S. (2017). Consumer’s food motives and seafood consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 56, 181–188.
[36] Tabler, T., Khaitsa, M. L., & Jonathan, M. (2021). Poultry Industry Grows across East Africa, but Challenges Remain, 1–4.
[37] UBoS. (2024). NATIONAL LIVESTOCK CENSUS 2021; Main report. Kampala, Uganda.
[38] UBoS. (2020). National population and housing census 2020: Main report.
[39] UKaid. (2019). Poultry sector study: Final sector, (March), 1–99.
[40] Ursule, S. R., & Isabelle, H. H. (2021). Socio-economic Situation of Poultry Farmer and the Local Chicken Production System on the East Coast of Madagascar. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, (November 2020).
[41] Wulandari, D., Roessali, W., & Budiraharjo, K. (2020). Willingness to pay for the native chicken eggs in supermarkets in Semarang city. Journal of Socioeconomics and Development, 3(2), 23–32.
[42] Yaemkong, S., Sonsurin, S., Khoktong, A., & Phumnual, S. (2018). Effect Of Locations. Education, Breeds, and Production Objectives for Raising Native Chicken on Revenue of Farmers in Wang Thong, Mueang, Bang Rakam and Phromphiram Districts, Phitsanulok Province.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kawala, M., Wabbi, J. B., Aseete, P., Zawedde, B. M. (2024). Determinants for Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Positively Selected Local Chicks in Eastern and Central Uganda. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9(6), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kawala, M.; Wabbi, J. B.; Aseete, P.; Zawedde, B. M. Determinants for Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Positively Selected Local Chicks in Eastern and Central Uganda. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2024, 9(6), 306-320. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kawala M, Wabbi JB, Aseete P, Zawedde BM. Determinants for Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Positively Selected Local Chicks in Eastern and Central Uganda. Int J Agric Econ. 2024;9(6):306-320. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13,
      author = {Mastulah Kawala and Jackline Bonabana Wabbi and Paul Aseete and Barbara Mugwanya Zawedde},
      title = {Determinants for Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Positively Selected Local Chicks in Eastern and Central Uganda
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
      volume = {9},
      number = {6},
      pages = {306-320},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20240906.13},
      abstract = {Despite rising demand, the supply of local chickens is declining, with their market share dropping from 87.7% to 69.9%, while exotic chicken populations have quadrupled from 4.6 million in 2008 to 17.8 million by 2021. To address this, the National Agricultural Research Organization is improving the production and productivity of Local chickens through positive selection of local chickens. This study investigates farmers’ willingness to pay for Positively selected Local Chicks (PLC) in Central and Eastern Uganda. A study involving 305 randomly selected poultry farming households from Central and Eastern Uganda. The study applies a probit model, to analyze the determinants that influence the probability that poultry farmers are willing to pay the market price bid (2700 UGX) for day-old positively selected local chicks. The dependent variable was the probability that poultry farmers are willing to pay the prevailing average market price whereby, they were categorized as 1= willingness to pay 2700 UGX and 0=Not willing to pay. An ordered probit model was used to analyze factors that influence the choice of price to be paid for a day-old positively selected Local chick. The dependent variable was the range of prices poultry farmers are willing to pay for day-old positively selected local chicken. Prices ranged from 1890, 2160, 2430, 2565, 2700, 2835, 2970, 3240, and 3510. They were categorized into; lower bid (less than 2700) market price bid (2700) and high bid (more than 2700 UGX). The study further analyzed the factors that influenced the maximum price that farmers are willing to pay for day-old positively selected local chicken, multiple linear regression was used. The study revealed that 89.84% of farmers were willing to pay the lowest price (1890 UGX) for day-old positively selected local chicks, while only 25.57% were willing to pay the market price of 2700 UGX. Factors influencing willingness to pay include the age of the farmer, household size, total land owned, education level, access to credit, membership in a farmer’s group, phone ownership, distance to the nearest market, and radio ownership. These findings suggest that targeted interventions are needed to enhance the adoption of positively selected local chicks.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Determinants for Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Positively Selected Local Chicks in Eastern and Central Uganda
    
    AU  - Mastulah Kawala
    AU  - Jackline Bonabana Wabbi
    AU  - Paul Aseete
    AU  - Barbara Mugwanya Zawedde
    Y1  - 2024/11/18
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13
    T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    SP  - 306
    EP  - 320
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3843
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20240906.13
    AB  - Despite rising demand, the supply of local chickens is declining, with their market share dropping from 87.7% to 69.9%, while exotic chicken populations have quadrupled from 4.6 million in 2008 to 17.8 million by 2021. To address this, the National Agricultural Research Organization is improving the production and productivity of Local chickens through positive selection of local chickens. This study investigates farmers’ willingness to pay for Positively selected Local Chicks (PLC) in Central and Eastern Uganda. A study involving 305 randomly selected poultry farming households from Central and Eastern Uganda. The study applies a probit model, to analyze the determinants that influence the probability that poultry farmers are willing to pay the market price bid (2700 UGX) for day-old positively selected local chicks. The dependent variable was the probability that poultry farmers are willing to pay the prevailing average market price whereby, they were categorized as 1= willingness to pay 2700 UGX and 0=Not willing to pay. An ordered probit model was used to analyze factors that influence the choice of price to be paid for a day-old positively selected Local chick. The dependent variable was the range of prices poultry farmers are willing to pay for day-old positively selected local chicken. Prices ranged from 1890, 2160, 2430, 2565, 2700, 2835, 2970, 3240, and 3510. They were categorized into; lower bid (less than 2700) market price bid (2700) and high bid (more than 2700 UGX). The study further analyzed the factors that influenced the maximum price that farmers are willing to pay for day-old positively selected local chicken, multiple linear regression was used. The study revealed that 89.84% of farmers were willing to pay the lowest price (1890 UGX) for day-old positively selected local chicks, while only 25.57% were willing to pay the market price of 2700 UGX. Factors influencing willingness to pay include the age of the farmer, household size, total land owned, education level, access to credit, membership in a farmer’s group, phone ownership, distance to the nearest market, and radio ownership. These findings suggest that targeted interventions are needed to enhance the adoption of positively selected local chicks.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections